US · economist.com

How to win Ukraine’s long war

Also: The Supreme Court’s activism will deepen cracks in America

This email was sent

Is this your brand on Milled? Claim it.

Also: The Supreme Court’s activism will deepen cracks in America
The Economist

Read in browser

June 30th 2022

The Economist this week

Highlights from the latest issue

The Economist

Ukraine won the short war. Mobile and resourceful, its troops inflicted terrible losses and confounded Russian plans to take Kyiv. Now comes the long war. It will drain weapons, lives and money until one side loses the will to fight on. So far, this is a war that Russia is winning. Our cover this week lays out how Ukraine and its backers can reverse the setback. A long war suits Russia. Both sides are using huge amounts of ammunition, but Russia has vastly more. The Russian economy is much larger than Ukraine’s and in far better shape. In pursuit of victory, Mr Putin is willing to commit war crimes and impose grievous suffering on his own people.
 
However, the long war does not have to be fought on Mr Putin’s terms. The Russian advance is slow and costly. With NATO-calibre weapons, fresh tactics and enough financial aid, Ukraine has every chance of forcing Russia’s armies to cede territory, as it did in the case of Snake Island this week. Even though the struggle will be hard, Ukraine can demonstrate the futility of Vladimir Putin’s campaign and emerge as a democratic, Westward-looking state. To do so it needs enduring support and that, alas, is still in doubt.


Zanny Minton Beddoes
Editor-in-chief

Editor’s picks

Must-reads from the current edition








The world this week

Finland and Sweden were formally invited to join NATO. Turkey, a member of the alliance, had been blocking their membership bids, claiming that they were too hospitable towards Kurdish separatists (whom Turkey considers terrorists). Turkey backed down after the two Nordic countries promised to be tougher on terrorism.

More from Politics this week

Several American companies responded to a Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v Wade, the ruling that declared abortion a constitutional right in 1973. Amazon, Apple, Meta, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft and Nike were among those that pledged to cover travel costs for employees seeking abortions and other medical care not available in their state.

More from Business this week

See full edition →

In case you missed it

One of our most popular stories from the past seven days


From Economist Films


Also from The Economist


We'd like to hear from you.    

Share your feedback or send us an email below to get in touch.

arrow Email [email protected]

arrow Share your feedback

 

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

This email has been sent to: -. If you'd like to update your details please click here. Replies to this email will not reach us. If you don't want to receive these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here.

Keep updated

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn YouTube

Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2022. All rights reserved.

Registered in England and Wales. No.236383

 

Registered office: The Adelphi, 1–11 John Adam Street, London, WC2N 6HT

Recent emails from The Economist See more