Truth has a way of finding me. Seek, and ye shall find.

God knows my heart is pure. He knows that I have spent my life trying to uncover what is hidden, serve others, and tell the truth even when doing so came at an enormous personal cost. I deliver whole truths—not a curated fragment, not a partisan approximation, and not the commercially convenient version—that set people free.

Last week, The AlphaWarrior Show surfaced in my Rumble feed with another installment of its ongoing Operation Gladio series.

Most people hear the words Operation Gladio and think of a declassified Cold War plot. They picture Europe, covert stay-behind armies, intelligence services, clandestine networks, terrorism, and allegations of false-flag violence.

But Gladio was not only about individual events. It was about methods. The battlefield was not merely physical. It was psychological. It was informational. It was economic.

Share

As I listened to the story of Paulette Cooper, the journalist who wrote The Scandal of Scientology, I cringed. After publishing the book, Cooper became the target of a documented Scientology campaign known as Operation Freakout. Internal records later revealed efforts to surveil her, harass her, destroy her credibility, frame her for supposed crimes, and have her imprisoned or committed to a psychiatric institution.

The objective was not simply to rebut her reporting. It was to dismantle the reporter.

Listening to what was done to her began confirming suspicions I’ve carried for years: that similar methods had been used against me—an award-winning investigative journalist and the director of the internationally acclaimed documentary Vanishing of the Bees, made back when Elliot Page was still publicly known as Ellen Page. (Wait—oops. Did I just “deadname” someone?)

In any case, the more important question is this:

What happens when a journalist follows stories that powerful or well-connected interests would prefer to leave buried?

They do not necessarily have to erase every word she writes. They only have to obstruct the pathways connecting her to you.

Non-Parrots and Presstitutes Are Needed In This World

REMINDER: Real journalists are still being killed. The Committee to Protect Journalists has documented 2,571 journalists and media workers killed between 1992 and 2026 in cases confirmed or suspected to be connected to their work. In 2025 alone, CPJ recorded 129 deaths, the highest annual number since it began keeping records in 1992.

But today, you do not always have to kill a journalist—pow, pow—to neutralize the journalism. You can digitally assassinate her instead.

Hide the work. Reduce the reach. Remove followers. Bury the posts. Restrict the accounts. Disrupt the income. Interfere with publishing, distribution, payment processing, professional relationships, and every mechanism through which an independent journalist remains visible, solvent, and connected to the audience she spent years building.

Create enough friction and, eventually, people assume she disappeared, became irrelevant, lost credibility, or simply stopped producing.

There is no gunshot, no blood, and no easily visible crime scene. There is only the slow destruction of visibility, livelihood, reputation, and human connection. The voice remains, but the pathways carrying it are quietly dismantled.

It Is All Optics

Journalists are still technically free to speak. The system simply makes certain that fewer and fewer people can find her, support her, or hear what she has to say.

You disappeared for a while, a customer told me. NO I DID NOT. I’ve been here, ‘insanely tapped in,’ as someone told me.

In 2019, speaking before the Anti-Defamation League, Sacha Baron Cohen popularized the formulation that freedom of speech does not necessarily mean freedom of reach. Elon Musk later announced a Twitter policy using nearly the same language: “freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach,” explaining that certain posts would be deboosted and demonetized.

That phrase reveals the sleight of hand. You do not have to delete someone’s account to erase her influence. You can leave the account standing, leave the articles online, and leave the videos technically available while quietly cutting the pathways that lead people to them.

The censorship is deniable because the content still exists. The erasure occurs in distribution. Thanks, ADL, for the slogan that two professional performers later delivered back to the public.

When I appear on a program, I suddenly become real again. When I walk onto a stage which is now only at Anarchupulco, people suddenly perceive me as someone of consequence. They see a living, breathing woman speaking coherently about evidence she spent years collecting. They remember that I am not an avatar, a rumor, a smear, or an abandoned account. I am real and authentic.

I am an award-winning journalist and filmmaker who has continued producing work despite years of financial, professional, and digital obstruction. Recently, someone I love pointed me to what Grok’s encyclopedia had written about my legacy. Reading it was surreal. It reminded me that, regardless of how history is rewritten or who tries to erase your contributions, impact leaves a trail.

Consider the AI the modern digital Akashic Records.

Visibility creates legitimacy in the public mind—even though the fruits of my labor exist and are ongoing. Inside an algorithmic graveyard, I am forgotten. The program ends. The algorithms close in again. The audience is disconnected again. And the forgetting resumes.

Share

Operation Gladio Tactics: Which Ones Were Used On Me? 🤯💥🧩💡👇👇👇

✅ Character assassination and smear campaigns.

✅ Infiltration of my business and personal circle.

✅ Economic warfare and financial destabilization.

✅ Deplatforming, payment restrictions, and censorship.

✅ Suppression and appropriation of my investigative work.

✅ Information obfuscation through selective truth and strategic omission.

✅ Isolation from colleagues and professional networks.

✅ Discouraging others from associating with me publicly.

✅ Reputational attacks that avoid confronting the evidence itself.

✅ Attrition—dragging disputes out until I am depleted emotionally, financially, and professionally.

✅ Confusion designed to make observers disengage.

✅ Reduced visibility while competing personalities and narratives are amplified.

✅ Pressure applied from several directions simultaneously.

✅ The inducement of self-censorship through fear, intimidation, and economic precarity.

Any one of these incidents could be dismissed as bad luck, professional conflict, technological error, or coincidence. The significance lies in their convergence.

One blocked payment processor is an inconvenience. Multiple financial, publishing, distribution, technological, and reputational disruptions occurring in sequence become a pattern worth examining.

Methods To Their Madness

Across intelligence history, psychological warfare, institutional retaliation, political conflict, corporate misconduct, and propaganda operations, certain methods recur.

The most effective tactic is to lower perceived importance.

People stop looking for your work. Colleagues stop mentioning you by name. Producers stop booking you. Potential supporters assume someone else has already investigated your claims—or that if the work truly mattered, they would be impossible to ignore.

The person is made easy to overlook. Abracadabra. That is how a human being is socially erased while remaining visibly alive.

As I write in my radioactive book Operation George Floyd, Tavistock’s business was not merely censorship. It was social engineering: creating crises, manufacturing consent, directing culture, and conditioning the masses to accept an imposed reality. I called it a “symphony of social engineers”—intelligence agencies, media corporations, Hollywood, advertising, and other institutions working in concert to distract, program, and manage public perception.

That is why every space can be captured, including the so-called resistance. The capture may not look like government censors kicking down the door. It may look like money, access, fame, selective amplification, controlled opposition, approved influencers, and professional cowards who understand exactly what they are permitted to say.

Some call themselves independent. Some call themselves Medical Freedom fighters. But when the incentives become more important than the truth, the movement becomes another managed ecosystem—and the grifters become its gatekeepers.

Some of these people speak endlessly about censorship, courage, Christianity, freedom, independent journalism, and standing up to power. Yet when helping an actual person they know requires five minutes, one phone call, one introduction, one booking, one purchase, one shared post, or even a modest act of generosity... the performance ends.

Methods to Their Madness

Across intelligence history, psychological warfare, institutional retaliation, political conflict, corporate misconduct, and propaganda operations, certain methods recur.

One of the most effective is to lower a person’s perceived importance.

People stop looking for your work. Colleagues stop mentioning you by name. Producers stop booking you. Potential supporters assume someone else has already investigated your claims—or that, if the work truly mattered, it would be impossible to ignore.

You have not disappeared. You have been made easy to overlook.

Abracadabra.

That is how a human being is socially erased while remaining visibly alive. I guess I had to live it firsthand to try to educate you on how this inverted matrix really works.

As I write in my radioactive book, Operation George Floyd, Tavistock’s business was not merely censorship. It was social engineering: creating crises, manufacturing consent, directing culture, and conditioning the masses to accept an imposed reality. I called it a “symphony of social engineers”—intelligence agencies, media corporations, Hollywood, advertising, and other institutions working in concert to distract, program, and manage public perception.

That is why every space can be captured, including the so-called resistance. Capture does not always look like government censors kicking down the door. It may look like money, access, fame, selective amplification, controlled opposition, approved influencers, and professional cowards who understand exactly what they are permitted to say.

Some call themselves independent. Some call themselves Medical Freedom fighters. But when incentives become more important than truth, the movement becomes another managed ecosystem—and the grifters become its gatekeepers.

Some of these people speak endlessly about censorship, courage, Christianity, freedom, independent journalism, and standing up to power. Yet when helping an actual person they know requires five minutes, one telephone call, one introduction, one booking, one purchase, one shared post, or even a modest act of generosity, the performance ends.

I have been told it is dangerous to see as much as I do.

Perhaps.

Or perhaps it is simply dangerous to say what I see out loud as the veil begins to vanish.

I am not claiming that every disappointment, algorithmic fluctuation, failed business arrangement, or professional rejection proves the existence of a centrally coordinated operation. I made mistakes. I trusted the wrong people. I own that.

What I reject is the convenient fiction that I somehow “failed.”

I built a million-dollar company from scratch. I directed two impactful documentaries. I spent five years writing this book. Keeping HoneyColony alive has required me to become a filmmaker, investigative journalist, publisher, marketer, salesperson, web developer, customer service representative, and fundraiser—a fucking Swiss Army knife.

This struggle is not mine alone. Many divine sparks, critical thinkers, and sovereign souls are being shunned into our personalized Room 101. As I like to say, it’s your own tailored torture.

I have spoken with other journalists who quietly describe the same pattern: diminished visibility, shrinking reach, professional isolation, and the slow realization that they are becoming increasingly difficult to find in what increasingly resembles a FA.IK and GA.IY construct.

One incident can be dismissed. A recurring pattern deserves scrutiny.

Study the chronology. Examine the documents. Look at who benefited while my original reporting disappeared behind larger personalities, search suppression, institutional silence, and, in some cases, paywalls.

🔒 WHO’S WHO IN THE ZOO

The public article explains the methods. The paid investigation examines the people. Below you'll find the extended video, chronology, supporting documentation, and the first names behind the pattern.

$11.11 unlocks the extended video, chronology, documentation, and the beginning of the names behind the pattern...