Allison Joyce/Getty Images |
|
|
|
In today’s edition, we run down the biggest headlines of the afternoon, take stock of the president's midterms meddling, and officially lay off the shrimp scampi. Have thoughts or feelings on what you read here? You can reach me directly by email. I’m at [email protected]. |
|
|
|
|
Caitlin Dewey, senior writer |
|
|
|
|
Caitlin Dewey, senior writer
|
|
|
|
The recent history of mail voting in the United States has more twists and turns than an Emmy-winning drama. But for the cause of democracy, at least, yesterday’s ending is a happy one.
On Monday, the Supreme Court definitively blocked President Donald Trump’s many attempts to sabotage voting by mail — opining, in a three-sentence brief, that Trump can’t implement his new rules for the 2026 midterms. Or for any election, probably.
Those last-minute rules, you may recall, would have required states to adopt new ballot envelopes and upload absentee voters’ names and envelope barcodes to a still-nonexistent online platform. Many officials argued they couldn’t possibly adopt the new measures before midterm voting starts, which would essentially cancel mail-in voting in their jurisdictions.
The Supreme Court, of course, has been broadly sympathetic to Trump’s legal antics, even when they appear to clearly flout law or precedent. But shutting down voting just before the midterms? That’s one bridge too far for them.
|
|
|
6 other ways Trump's messing with the midterms |
|
|
|
Hobbling vote-by-mail was just one of Trump’s plots to meddle in the midterms, however — and several of the others are still underway. Here’s where some of the president’s most significant election maneuvers stand today: |
|
|
How worried should you be going into the midterms? That, my friend, is a question to answer in your own little heart. But I’m taking my cues from Vox’s politics editor, Benjy Sarlin, who recently reminded listeners of our America, Actually podcast that there are many, many institutional and logistical barriers to many of Trump’s more concerning legal machinations.
“We’re taking it very seriously here…and nothing’s guaranteed,” he acknowledged. “But it is still a very difficult path [where] so far he has had zero success.”
|
|
|
-
Reiner case: Prosecutors announced that they will not seek the death penalty against Nick Reiner, who’s accused of killing his famous parents, Rob and Michele Reiner.
-
Price of gas: Rising oil costs are fueling protests, shortages, and strikes around the world as countries struggle to absorb the cost of the war in Iran.
-
On the podcast: Fears of impending AI doom have burst into the mainstream. They still might not be enough for Washington to regulate AI. Listen to the whole thing here.
|
|
|
|
➨ Skip the shrimp. A new analysis by researchers at the University of Bath and Faunalytics, an animal welfare group, attempts to quantify the amount of animal suffering required to produce different factory-farmed foods. They concluded that eating smaller animals = causing greater suffering, simply because you have to eat — and, by extension, farm and kill — so many more of them.
|
|
|
|
-
Did you know…that American founding father Thomas Jefferson was obsessed with mastodons? It's actually one of the reasons that he sent Lewis and Clark on their famous expedition.
-
Today’s trivia: Which English-language remake of an older French film won the Academy Award for Best Picture in 2022? (You can find this and other brain puzzles in Vox’s daily crossword. Look for the answer in tomorrow’s edition.)
-
Yesterday’s trivia: Yesterday we asked you for the former pro hockey player who founded a major Canadian restaurant chain. That would be Tim Horton, whose eponymous cafes have occasionally gotten snarled in the trade spat between Canada and the United States.
|
|
|
Today’s edition was produced and edited by me, Caitlin Dewey. Thanks for reading! |
|
|
|
Have thoughts or feelings on what you read here? You can reach me directly by email. I’m at [email protected]. |
|
|
|
